About Basic Property

The title of one of the AAAI 2019 Spring Symposia is „Interpretable AI for Well-Being: Understanding Cognitive Bias and Social Embeddedness“. An important keyword here is „social embeddedness“. Social embeddedness of AI includes issues like „AI and future economics (such as basic income, impact of AI on GDP)“ or „well-being society (such as happiness of citizen, life quality)“. In his paper „Are Robot Tax, Basic Income or Basic Property Solutions to the Social Problems of Automation?“ Oliver Bendel discusses and criticizes these approaches in the context of automation and digitization. Moreover, he develops a relatively unknown proposal, unconditional basic property, and presents its potentials as well as its risks. The lecture by Oliver Bendel took place on 26 March 2019 at Stanford University and led to lively discussions.

Fig.: The talk by Oliver Bendel

About Basic Income and Basic Property

Automation is advancing relentlessly. Already decades ago, digitization was its partner. In the industry, innovative robots, for example co-robots, are used. Service robots begin to spread in various areas. Systems of artificial intelligence perform tasks of all sorts, even creative activities. The studies on the development of the labor market reach different results. In any case, it can be said that certain jobs will disappear and many people will have to do without their familiar work. It can also be assumed that in many areas less human work has to be performed on behalf (e.g., for customers and employers). As possible solutions to economic and social problems, an unconditional basic income and a robot tax are suggested. The paper „Are Robot Tax, Basic Income or Basic Property Solutions to the Social Problems of Automation?“ by Oliver Bendel presents, discusses and criticizes these approaches in the context of automation and digitization. Moreover, it develops a relatively unknown proposal, unconditional basic property, and presents its potentials as well as its risks. The ethicist from Zurich will share his results between 25 and 27 March 2019 at the AAAI Spring Symposia (Stanford University).

Fig.: A nice property in Hawaii

KI ist hier, um zu bleiben

In der Automation & Robotics vom März 2018, einer Beilage im Manager Magazin, findet sich ein Beitrag von Jan Philipp Albrecht (innen- und justizpolitischer Sprecher der Grünen-Fraktion im Europäischen Parlament). Er schreibt: „Wir stehen an der Schwelle zu einer Ära, in der immer höher entwickelte Technologien eine neue industrielle Revolution entfesseln können. Künstliche Intelligenz ist allgegenwärtig, und sie ist hier, um zu bleiben.“ Unter dem Stichwort „Simplexity“ führt Prof. Dr. Andreas Dengel (DFKI) aus: „KI definiert die neue Arbeitsteilung von Mensch und Maschine“. Im Interview erklärt Oliver Bendel, was Maschinenethik ist und wie sie mit KI und Robotik zusammenhängt. Er ist gegen eine vorschnelle Regulierung in der Entwicklung. Wenn Regulierung stattfinden soll, dann in den Anwendungsgebieten. An anderer Stelle hatte der Informations- und Maschinenethiker eine Roboterquote für öffentliche Räume gefordert, zum einen wegen der Kollisionsgefahr (bei Transport- und Sicherheitsrobotern), zum anderen wegen der Gefahr der Überwachung (bei Servicerobotern aller Art). Das Interview kann hier heruntergeladen werden.

Abb.: KI ist hier, um zu bleiben