Care Robots from an Ethical Perspective

On 5 June 2023, Prof. Dr. Oliver Bendel will give a talk on „Care robots from an ethical perspective“ at the Institute of Ethics, History and Humanities (iEH2) of the University of Geneva. The event will take place in room A04.2910 (CMU). Care and therapy robots can be understood as service robots and in many cases also as social robots. In the talk by Professor Dr. Oliver Bendel from Zurich, the goals, tasks, and characteristics will be clarified and, based on this, considerations will be made from the perspective of ethics. In the end, it should become clear which types of robots and prototypes or products exist in the healthcare sector, what purposes they serve, what functions they assume, and what implications and consequences this has for individuals and society. Care robots may contribute to personal autonomy while weakening informational autonomy. Therapy robots may enhance personal performance and satisfaction, but in individual cases they may also violate human dignity. It is important to design service robots and social robots in the healthcare sector in such a way that they meet as many requirements and needs as possible and are useful tools for caregivers and those in need of care. Disciplines such as machine ethics can help in this regard. Prof. Dr. Oliver Bendel is the editor of several relevant standard works, including „Pflegeroboter“ („Care Robots“, 2018) and „Soziale Roboter“ („Social Robots“, 2021). He has also advised the German Bundestag on this topic. More information via www.unige.ch/medecine/ieh2/fr/la-une/prochain-colloque-ieh2/.

Fig.: Bendel as scientific director of the 23rd Berlin Colloquium (Photo: Daimler und Benz Stiftung)

The Third and Last Salon Suisse of Biennale 2021

Within the third and last Salon Suisse in November 2021, curated by Evelyn Steiner, bodily alterations and optimization measures „like body hacking or anti-ageing procedures“ were „assessed and adapted to architectural discourse“. Consistent with its broad approach, it dealt „with a multitude of disciplines and themes, including psychoanalysis, medical anthropology, neurosciences, literature, interior design, transhumanism, fluid spaces, habitation and migration, borderscapes, mood-sensitive houses, and many more“ (Booklet Salon Suisse). At the event on November 18 („Jethro Knights, Armor Guyver, and Mutant X: How transhumanists challenge architecture“), Oliver Bendel gave a presentation on the topic „Human and animal enhancement in the context of architecture“, followed by a discussion with Mike Schaffner (a Swiss cyborg) and Georg Vrachliotis (an architect from TU Delft). On November 19 the event’s title was „Anti-ageing architecture: Can buildings help you to live forever?“. After the film documentary „Children who won’t die“ the curator discussed with Irene Sunwoo. „Beyond the binary: Fluid Spaces for a fluid Generation“ on November 20 was the title of a discussion with Jos Boys and Joel Sanders, framed by a performance by Nathalie Rebholz.

Fig.: At the entrance of Palazzo Trevisan (Photo: Samuele Cherubini, © Pro Helvetia)

A Solution to the Nursing Crisis?

„In Germany, around four million people will be dependent on care and nursing in 2030. Already today there is talk of a nursing crisis, which is likely to intensify further in view of demographic developments in the coming years. Fewer and fewer young people will be available to the labour market as potential carers for the elderly. Experts estimate that there will be a shortage of around half a million nursing staff in Germany by 2030. Given these dramatic forecasts, are nursing robots possibly the solution to the problem? Scientists from the disciplines of computer science, robotics, medicine, nursing science, social psychology, and philosophy explored this question at a Berlin conference of the Daimler and Benz Foundation. The machine ethicist and conference leader Professor Oliver Bendel first of all stated that many people had completely wrong ideas about care robots: ‚In the media there are often pictures or illustrations that do not correspond to reality‘.“ (Die Welt, 14 June 2019) With these words an article in the German newspaper Die Welt begins. Norbert Lossau describes the Berlin Colloquium, which took place on 22 May 2019, in detail. The article is available in English and German. So are robots a solution to the nursing crisis? Oliver Bendel denies this. They can be useful for the caregiver and the patient. But they don’t solve the big problems.

Fig.: The Pepper robot at the Berlin Colloquium (photo: Daimler and Benz Foundation)

Robots and AI Systems in Healthcare

Robots in the health sector are important, valuable innovations and supplements. As therapy and nursing robots, they take care of us and come close to us. In addition, other service robots are widespread in nursing and retirement homes and hospitals. With the help of their sensors, all of them are able to recognize us, to examine and classify us, and to evaluate our behavior and appearance. Some of these robots will pass on our personal data to humans and machines. They invade our privacy and challenge the informational autonomy. This is a problem for the institutions and the people that needs to be solved. The article “The Spy who Loved and Nursed Me: Robots and AI Systems in Healthcare from the Perspective of Information Ethics” by Oliver Bendel presents robot types in the health sector, along with their technical possibilities, including their sensors and their artificial intelligence capabilities. Against this background, moral problems are discussed, especially from the perspective of information ethics and with respect to privacy and informational autonomy. One of the results shows that such robots can improve the personal autonomy, but the informational autonomy is endangered in an area where privacy has a special importance. At the end, solutions are proposed from various disciplines and perspectives. The article was published in Telepolis on December 17, 2018 and can be accessed via www.heise.de/tp/features/The-Spy-who-Loved-and-Nursed-Me-4251919.html.

Fig.: When monitoring becomes surveillance