Robot Dreams

Wie die Frankfurter Allgemeine meldet, läuft der oscarnominierte Animationsfilm „Robot Dreams“ im Kino an. Es ist die Geschichte eines einsamen Hunds namens Dog. „Abends läuft bei Dog die Glotze, und es gibt Käse-Makkaroni aus der Mikrowelle.“ (FAZ, 8. Mai 2024) In der Werbung erfährt er vom humanoiden Amica 2000. „Einmal zusammengebaut, wird der Roboter mit den Spaghetti-Armen und -Beinen schnell zu Dogs bestem Freund.“ (FAZ, 8. Mai 2024) Die beiden flanieren durchs alte New York und gehen an den Strand von Coney Island. Dort kann sich der Roboter – wenige Stunden vor der Schließung – plötzlich nicht mehr bewegen. Er muss zurückbleiben und Dog in sein Zuhause und in seine Einsamkeit zurückkehren. Die Zeit zieht sich wie der Käse in den Makkaroni, die Dog alleine isst. Der Roboter befreundet sich derweil mit einer Vogelfamilie. Und beide träumen auf ihre Art vom Wiedersehen. Die FAZ schreibt: „In seiner komplexen Einfachheit ist ‚Robot Dreams‘ ein Familienfilm im besten Sinne: ein sympathischer Film über zwei nichtmenschliche Außenseiter im urbanen Dschungel, der das Menschlichste überhaupt in eine -generationenübergreifende Bildsprache übersetzt.“ (FAZ, 8. Mai 2024) Roboter sind auch nur Menschen. Hunde erst recht.

Abb.: Ein Roboter am Strand (Bild: Ideogram)

Spot Puts on a Dog Costume and Dances

Prof. Dr. Oliver Bendel introduced the term „robot enhancement“ in 2020 and has since used it in several articles and book chapters. Robot enhancement is the extension and associated modification or improvement of the robot by the user or a company, for example in functional, aesthetic, ethical, or economic terms. The word was coined in reference to „human enhancement“ and „animal enhancement“, and can be used to describe both the field of work and the object. One form of robot enhancement is social robot enhancement, in which a social robot is enhanced or modified and improved. An impressive example of robot enhancement is shown in a video by Boston Dynamics. A „naked“ spot and a spot with a dog costume dance together in the hall where Atlas used to be seen again and again. Such robot enhancement should not necessarily be imitated by the user. There are some robots that cannot stand the costume and will heat up – to the point of becoming defective.

Fig.: The disguised Spot and the „naked“ Spot (Photo: YouTube/Boston Dynamics)

A Competitor for AIBO?

Xiaomi has unveiled CyberDog, a four-legged robot that could be a competitor to Sony’s AIBO. According to the Chinese company, it is calibrated with servo motors that translates into great speed, agility, and a wide range of motion. It is able to conduct complicated actions such as backflips. „To fully model biological organisms, CyberDog is equipped with 11 high-precision sensors which provide instant feedback to guide its movements. This includes touch sensors, cameras, ultrasonic sensors, GPS modules, and more, giving the CyberDog enhanced capability to sense, analyze, and interact with its environment.“ (Mi Blog, 10 August 2021) Unlike AIBO, CyberDog looks rather frightening. This is because it does not have an actual head. In this it is comparable to Spot from Boston Dynamics. Nevertheless, it is intended to function as a pet substitute. „To add to its pet-like nature, users can use voice assistants to command and control CyberDog by setting a wake word, or simply use its accompanying remote and smartphone app. CyberDog can be called on for the most unique tasks, and the ways in which it can be interacted with holds unforetold possibilities.“ (Mi Blog, 10 August 2021) The future will show whether users want to become friends with CyberDog.

Fig.: A dog-like toy

Dog Sit!

The field of animal-machine interaction is gaining new research topics with social robots. Meiying Qin from Yale University and her co-authors have brought together a Nao and a dog. From the abstract of their paper: „In two experiments, we investigate whether dogs respond to a social robot after the robot called their names, and whether dogs follow the ’sit‘ commands given by the robot. We conducted a between-subjects study (n = 34) to compare dogs‘ reactions to a social robot with a loudspeaker. Results indicate that dogs gazed at the robot more often after the robot called their names than after the loudspeaker called their names. Dogs followed the ’sit‘ commands more often given by the robot than given by the loudspeaker. The contribution of this study is that it is the first study to provide preliminary evidence that 1) dogs showed positive behaviors to social robots and that 2) social robots could influence dog’s behaviors. This study enhance the understanding of the nature of the social interactions between humans and social robots from the evolutionary approach. Possible explanations for the observed behavior might point toward dogs perceiving robots as agents, the embodiment of the robot creating pressure for socialized responses, or the multimodal (i.e., verbal and visual) cues provided by the robot being more attractive than our control condition.“ (Abstract) You can read the full paper via dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3371382.3380734.

Fig.: Dog sit!